On the subject of timepieces, tremendous or in any other case, type is commonly not a part of the package deal…no less than not type as outlined right here by the Oxford dictionary, which matches one thing like this: a particular look, usually decided by the rules in keeping with which one thing is designed. In fact, if one appears to be like at Mirriam-Webster, one finds one thing just a little extra helpful to the concept of fashion and watchmaking: a particular high quality, type, or sort of one thing. That one is succinct and maybe greatest suited relating to introducing a person for whom type is his whole job…properly, part of it no less than.

Helpfully, Pierre Rainero, Director of Picture, Type and Heritage at Cartier, has revealed his personal definition of fashion, which I’ve referenced on multiple event. It can now come house to roost, which I discover most gratifying. “Type is the incarnation of a philosophy that conveys advanced issues in a easy means. It has its personal sensibility, and thus turns into a means of anticipating, experiencing, and speaking emotions and feelings – type, maybe, is solely the expression of a imaginative and prescient.” Rainero wrote that in his chapter within the Flamarion hardcover Cartier: The Energy of Type (2010).

Combining picture and heritage with type, and also you would possibly suppose that Rainero is the de facto inventive or inventive director, however that’s not the case. No such position exists at Cartier, though his title initially was Communication and Creative Director again in 1999. Actually, Rainero has held various roles at Cartier since 1984, when he first joined. It was a time of change on the storied jewelry and watch agency, and Rainero has had a entrance seat alongside the good names of that point…Perrin, Cologni, Fornas… We sat down with Rainero to listen to his story at Watches and Wonders Geneva 2023.

You’ve got a relatively spectacular title, which you might have held since 2003. Inform us about it? 

Effectively, day-after-day is completely different in fact, as a result of actually I’ve many various issues I’m concerned in… The central duty, in fact, and that explains all the opposite ones (as you will notice), is my involvement within the inventive course of. In order that’s successfully the type a part of my title.

In 1998, Alain Dominique Perrin was President of Cartier and he had that position (as inventive director) with out having the title – he was president, so he may do the whole lot. In 1999, when he was leaving to develop into president of Richemont, he instructed me ‘you can be the inventive director.’

So, for some time I had the Communication and Creative Director title, and really shortly I noticed that it was not precisely what I used to be doing. For 2 causes. First, I noticed instantly that there are a lot of people who find themselves accountable within the inventive course of; within the making-of strategy of the inventive dimension of every of our objects. There’s mainly a synergy of abilities. In all probability I may have already got identified this (earlier than taking over the position)!

Anyway, every of those creatives has an affect on the inventive half; you understand that in jewelry, it’s much more apparent than in watches.

So that you knew that nobody particular person may do the job?

It isn’t one one that may very well be entitled to (all the inventive dimension) as a result of it’s not true. The second cause (that my job was not precisely what my title mentioned it was) was, in a means, actually to have and share a imaginative and prescient of what a Cartier object needs to be as we speak, and naturally, within the close to future, as a result of we work some years prematurely, relying on the class of things.

I’m not the inventive as a result of the inventive half is on the facet of the designers because it has all the time been for the reason that time of Louis Cartier himself, and Jeanne Toussaint [the legendary fashion and jewellery designer]. Louis Cartier himself used to name them (the designers) the inventors.

Inform us about your portfolio as it’s as we speak, and what a typical day appears to be like like for you?

So my position (as we speak) is to debate with the creatives (the inventors), in any respect phases, about which course Cartier ought to go in direction of. (Collectively, we attempt to determine) what makes Cartier so completely different, with a historic strategy (for instance), and attempt to clarify why the objects have been like they have been at the moment. What was the philosophy behind these objects and the way can or does this philosophy apply as we speak. My interplay with the creatives is in any respect phases, even earlier than the design temporary.

Daily, I’ve many questions arriving on my desk. Perhaps I’ve a design head, the pinnacle of a studio, saying we’re considering of doing one thing, and what do you consider it. Or perhaps they’ve a prototype to point out me. These are the unscheduled conferences, however in fact there are many scheduled ones!

And by the best way, the type a part of my title consists of my involvement in the whole lot that’s created at Cartier, just like the structure of the shops for example. I’m additionally concerned the identical means with the architects and inside designers…I’m the hyperlink between picture and magnificence as a result of successfully the type of the shop is part of image-building, for instance. As a consequence, I’m additionally in command of the cultural and inventive elements of Cartier. This implies all Cartier’s hyperlinks with exterior establishments or colleges everywhere in the world. You realize, so I journey loads [before Watches and Wonders Geneva 2023, Rainero was in Mexico City for a Cartier exhibition and he went to Hong Kong the week after the fair for another exhibition scheduled to open there]. My work will not be solely with the curators (of the exhibitions) but additionally the backroom half, together with contract negotiations and this type of factor. There’s additionally a everlasting element to this as a result of we’re all the time in touch with some establishments, such because the Louvre in Paris, the British Museum and the Metropolitan in New York, as a result of they’ve Cartier items of their (respective) collections (and should purchase historic items now or in future).

Why is Cartier’s historical past so highly effective?

The historical past of Cartier and the manufacturing of Cartier each are so wealthy as a result of (amongst different issues) for the reason that first years of the twentieth century, we turned the primary actual (watch and jewelry Maison) on the earth. That means by way of innovation (by advantage of being first), sure, but additionally simply by way of manufacturing. We turned type of an object of curiosity for the individuals of the entire world. A century in the past, Cartier was so massive that each one the opposite jewellers have been it and calling it the ‘Agency’ as a result of it was already one thing unbelievable. We had manufacturing already in London and New York so, as I used to say, it was actually potential for a younger man to have a world profession at Cartier within the early twentieth century. It was actually not so removed from a world firm of as we speak. We have been sending individuals to Hong Kong, to Tehran, to South America…we now have all of the experiences of these individuals (the industrial experiences).

It’s unbelievable once you consider it, in order that’s why there’s a richness by way of manufacturing, and in addition completely different classes of merchandise as a result of Carter is so distinctive on this means…and in addition of getting that watchmaking half as equal to the jewelry half. We additionally tremendously improved the making of objects of many various varieties, and it makes Cartier one of many most important actors within the ornamental arts within the utilized arts section. There’s additionally a human dimension to this story, and I’m not referring solely to the Cartier household (in these early days) as a result of very, in a short time the household wanted lots of people to handle the corporate.

What types of persons are you referring to, and are you ever stunned by what you your self study concerning the model?

So they’re much less identified to the skin world however we at Cartier know them. I’m speaking concerning the administrators for London and for New York, you understand the succession of them (and the numerous issues they did for Cartier)… For example, the assistance we gave to Charles de Gaulle throughout World Battle II was determined by the director, not by the Cartier household. This was simply one among many examples, together with Jeanne Toussaint [who was not a member of the Cartier family, but was appointed Director of Fine Jewellery by Louis Cartier in 1933; she remained with the firm until 1970, after the Cartier family had sold the business].

So that you realise the facility of these individuals…the artisans; it’s an unbelievable variety of individuals through the years. It’s a human journey, the story of Cartier, you understand, and that makes it so wealthy. This additionally makes it tough to apprehend the whole lot about Cartier as a result of as a industrial entity, what we hold in our archives is principally linked to how the corporate works and the manufacturing; that’s already crucial as a result of it’s the hyperlink with the shoppers. However you understand, of all the scale of choices taken to open a retailer or a market, we solely hold what we now have a authorized obligation to maintain. The knowledge on private interactions (and the human story of the individuals who labored at Cartier), we now have nearly nothing, or maybe we now have just a few issues. In order that’s why I see there are a lot of, many issues nonetheless to find…together with the rationale why the title Ronde was given to this Santos mannequin [a vintage watch worn by a Cartier employee who sat in on the interview], which is definitely not spherical in any respect…I by no means obtained a solution to my query once I first joined in 1984, and I nonetheless don’t know!

Shifting to watches and jewelry, how necessary is the texture of the items versus how they appear?

In jewelry, ergonomics is vital, and actually our imaginative and prescient by way of watchmaking and jewelry is linked (by this). It’s a particular ability in jewelry (or to jewelry) in contemplating how the thing will put on… it’s not like making little sculptures, which is one thing which may come to thoughts (as being analogous). Jewelry is worn, and worn primarily by girls, and in addition all the time in movement, which has monumental penalties for the way the jewellers conceive objects. This tradition (of creativity) from jewelry can also be crucial for watchmaking (as a result of watches are additionally worn). So if we now have a selected (identification) by our creations in watchmaking, it’s as a result of we have been a jeweller earlier than being a watchmaker.

I feel being a jeweller first additionally gave us (a level of) freedom in a means and that additionally makes it completely apparent once you consider the (preliminary) choice to go on shapes. Actually, we turned the designer of shapes by way of watchmaking, however there’s a complete logic there as a result of we weren’t initially a supplier of actions and we weren’t on the technical facet; we have been a creator of lovely objects. For us, a watch was a ravishing object or needed to be a ravishing object, and that’s our imaginative and prescient and explains the whole lot we do, until as we speak I feel.

What’s a Cartier watch design that challenged you?

Effectively, the Ballon Bleu was for me one of the fascinating workouts I needed to face by way of creativity as a result of we wished a spherical watch, however usually Cartier, so it’s a contradiction in phrases. As a result of, you understand, we have been born doing all shapes however spherical (and thus identified for our vary of assorted shapes, as I mentioned). Thus for Ballon Bleu, we mentioned let’s consider this design as if nothing is unimaginable; unimaginable will not be French!

So, we went ahead and the concept was to create one thing like a pebble; the good concept was to do away with the (conventional) crown) by together with it inside the round form of the case (as a substitute of protruding because it usually does) in an area that was like a bubble. Clearly, it’s not an everyday spherical watch as a result of it’s so weird to not have the crown current as traditional. However the design logic is there, and the ergonomic presence of the watch, by way of how mushy it feels, is there. One factor I recall completely about this mannequin is the design of the bracelet, which I believed needs to be elegant and serviceable, not including one thing else by way of creativity, or one other focal point.

How a lot of Cartier’s design philosophy, so far as watches go, may be tied again to 1904?

I feel once you analyze the creations, the completely different creations by way of watchmaking from 1904, the unique design of the Santos (from the primary piece designed in 1904, for aviator Alberto Santos-Dumont after which the manufacturing fashions in 1911) till (the designs of) 1917, and the Twenties…it is vitally, very fascinating as a result of you might have that concept to design for the primary time an object that incorporates a watch designed particularly to be worn on the wrist (as a software).

That was good as a result of earlier than that, a person may solely put on a pocket watch linked with a strap on his wrist. The premise of the design for the watch Santos-Dumont would use was a sq. form with rounded corners as a result of we had pocket watches on this type. However, if we create an object, it has to have aesthetical validity; the Santos-Dumont of 1904 was legitimate as an object, however for Louis Cartier and his workforce it was not equivalent to the purest form potential to attain the target (of being a terrific wristwatch). So we adopted up with the Tonneau watch simply two years (1906) later, which was greater. That’s the reason it was curved, as a result of it needed to comply with the curve of a wrist. If it was smaller, it may very well be flat, so in 1912, we got here up with the Tortue, which is the flat model.

5 years later, in 1917, it was the (now-famous) two parallel strains (that characterised the Tank). There’s nothing less complicated than two parallel strains that hyperlink up (the Tank Normale this yr harks again to this unique Tank). In 1922, Louis Cartier himself requested to do away with that metallic between the lugs, and to simply have the 2 parallel strains and no metallic (or as little metallic displaying as potential). So, in our archives, this Tank is instantly known as Tank Louis Cartier. Louis Cartier personally requested to try this and to provide that mannequin, you understand, and it was not typically like this, the place he interfered within the design course of. So if that watch bears that title, it’s as a result of his will to switch it was very robust. The sense of purity right here is de facto one thing crucial, not just for Louis Cartier however for many individuals of this time. The 2 first many years of the twentieth century, that’s the place many revolutions occurred by way of design, artwork usually and lots of different areas, and Louis Cartier is a part of this new period.

This text was first revealed on WOW Autumn Difficulty #70

For extra on the newest in luxurious watches, click on right here.