For individuals who have adopted Tesla for lengthy, or have adopted virtually any notable tales relating to the Tesla board of administrators, you’re for positive acquainted with claims that the Tesla board and Elon Musk are far too shut and that there’s not sufficient independence on the board. It’s generally claimed that the board simply does no matter Elon Musk desires. Now, US Senator Elizabeth Warren is pushing for stronger motion on this matter.

Senator Warren has despatched a letter to the Securities and Change Fee (SEC) asking that the SEC examine the board, indicating concern about “conflicts of curiosity, misappropriation of company property, and different adverse impacts to Tesla shareholders” particularly associated to Elon Musk’s Twitter acquisition and actions within the months that adopted.

It’s a 9-page letter, so I received’t quote all of it right here. However I’ll pull out just a few quotes:

“The Board’s inaction and insufficient disclosures, and the shut relationships of a number of Board members to Mr. Musk, increase questions in regards to the effectiveness of their company governance and potential violations of securities legal guidelines.”

“Regardless of hiring Ms. Yaccarino [as CEO of Twitter], he’s more likely to retain ‘vital management’ over the corporate and intends to proceed overseeing core features of the enterprise. Given the issues in regards to the actions by Mr. Musk and the Board, I ask that the SEC conduct a overview to find out if they’ve complied with related securities legal guidelines.”

“In December 2022, in a letter to Tesla’s Chair of the Board of Administrators, Dr. Robyn Denholm, I expressed my issues in regards to the company governance points raised by the construction of Mr. Musk’s deal to purchase Twitter and his actions after turning into CEO, together with:

• • The attainable misappropriation of Tesla sources by Mr. Musk’s funneling of ‘greater than 50 of his trusted Tesla staff’ to work on his Twitter takeover, together with Tesla’s Chief Data Officer and different senior employees. This use of Tesla staff raised apparent questions on whether or not Mr. Musk appropriated sources from a publicly traded agency, Tesla, to profit his personal personal firm, Twitter. This may doubtlessly violate Mr. Musk’s authorized obligation of loyalty to Tesla and set off questions in regards to the Board’s accountability to stop such actions, and may run afoul different ‘antitunneling’ guidelines that purpose to stop company insiders from extracting sources from their companies.
  • Inevitable conflicts of curiosity arising from, for instance, Twitter’s reliance on promoting income from vehicle corporations which are in direct competitors with Tesla, together with Audi, Chevrolet, Ford, GM, Jeep, and Volkswagen. Because the proprietor of Twitter, Mr. Musk may determine to run the corporate to maximise badly-needed income, even when that features nice offers for Tesla’s rivals and potential harm to Tesla. Alternatively, Mr. Musk may run Twitter to profit Tesla by favorable algorithms or free promoting. These issues have solely grown since Tesla lately introduced its intention to start promoting, selecting to launch its first ever advert by Twitter.”

“Issues about Mr. Musk’s actions as Tesla CEO have solely elevated in current months. In April 2023, a bunch of 17 main Tesla traders wrote an open letter to Tesla’s Board expressing concern ‘that the Board of Administrators is failing to adequately signify the pursuits of Tesla’s shareholders.’ The letter notes that Mr. Musk ‘seems to be distracted or overly centered on different ventures’ and the Board’s ‘meager oversight’ over his habits is ‘jeopardizing [Tesla’s] long-term worth.’ Furthermore, the letter notes the reported ‘shut private relationships’ between Mr. Musk and several other members of Tesla’s Board, in addition to Board members’ ‘exceptionally excessive compensation,’ expressing concern in regards to the Board’s ‘objectivity, independence, and skill to prioritize the wants of Tesla and its shareholders.’”

If you wish to learn extra, you’ll be able to take a look at the entire letter. The general level, although, is {that a} US Senator is pushing for the SEC to look into the connection between Elon Musk and the Tesla board, particularly because it issues Elon Musk’s operating of Twitter. We’ll see what comes of it.

I do not like paywalls. You do not like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Right here at CleanTechnica, we applied a restricted paywall for some time, nevertheless it at all times felt unsuitable — and it was at all times robust to determine what we should always put behind there. In idea, your most unique and greatest content material goes behind a paywall. However then fewer folks learn it! We simply don’t love paywalls, and so we have determined to ditch ours.

Sadly, the media enterprise continues to be a tricky, cut-throat enterprise with tiny margins. It is a endless Olympic problem to remain above water and even maybe — gasp — develop. So …