Not too long ago folks have been asking me to supply an opinion on a brand new shade of hydrogen, white. My shade blindness makes all the hydrogen shade spectrum even sillier than it already is, as I believe we’re at 23 extra colours than required at current.

Actually, there are solely two forms of hydrogen — low-carbon hydrogen and high-carbon hydrogen. If colours are utilized, they need to be inexperienced and black. The Hydrogen Science Coalition founders, engineers with lengthy skilled and educational expertise of hydrogen, argued amongst themselves about what a climate-solution aligned cutoff level needs to be for hydrogen manufacturing, and settled on a kilogram of carbon dioxide or equal (CO2e) generated in manufacturing a kilogram of hydrogen. That fairly good threshold suggests a kilogram or much less is inexperienced, and all the things else is black. I’d be okay with that. At the least I may inform the colours aside.

Full lifecycle carbon depth of hydrogen is the purpose, not the method or uncooked supplies used to fabricate it. The entire colours are simply variants of course of or supply, which is inflicting complications even amongst folks with regular shade notion, to not point out competing definitions of colours.

Let’s study what one kilogram per kilogram carbon depth means, just a bit bit. It takes, with steadiness of plant, 55 to 60 kWh of electrical energy to fabricate a kilogram of hydrogen utilizing electrolysis. That’s not going to develop into magically smaller, by the best way, as we’re approaching the boundaries of physics on this level. It’s not inclined to Wright’s legislation, the place a doubling of models manufactured reduces prices per unit by 20% to 27%. There are scaling economies accessible to hydrogen manufacturing, however principally by making very large vegetation, which can nonetheless be very capital intensive.

Utilizing the one kilogram of CO2e, that implies that every kWh of electrical energy can have a carbon debt of about 18 grams of CO2e. That works simply fantastic in my residence province of British Columbia in Canada from grid electrical energy, which has a carbon depth of 12.9 grams CO2e per kWh. Vermont has a good decrease stage of CO2e per kWh, and will manufacture inexperienced hydrogen by this definition from grid electrical energy, whereas even Washington State can’t reduce it at about 84 grams CO2e/kWh. Over in Europe, Sweden comes closest, however remains to be at 45 grams CO2e/kWh, over double the cutoff. And all grid electrical energy is decarbonizing, albeit not as rapidly as required. Ultimately all grids will probably be within the British Columbia and Vermont vary.

Nonetheless, I’d somewhat have grid hydrogen in Vermont or Sweden than hydrogen manufactured from pure gasoline, which between upstream methane emissions and the steam reformation course of is within the 10 kilograms of CO2e per kilogram of hydrogen.  And blue hydrogen is prone to solely deliver that right down to 2-4 kilograms of CO2e per kilogram of hydrogen, and the decrease finish of that vary requires very stringent upstream methane emissions administration.

For context on the diploma of lobbying round what constitutes ‘inexperienced’ hydrogen, the EU guidelines for renewable hydrogen peg carbon depth that’s ok at 3.38 kilograms of CO2e per kilogram of hydrogen. Sure, the Hydrogen Science Coalition thinks that’s not a great stage. Sure, there’s a lot of criticism of that carbon intensity from all kinds of sources. There’s a great motive for that. It’s not remotely aligned with hitting local weather objectives, even when the EU wasn’t foolishly and briefly obsessive about making hydrogen a provider of power. However it’s inside attain for hydrogen manufactured from pure gasoline. Handy, no?

Why am I so targeted on grid electrical energy? Two causes.

The primary is that 85% of hydrogen we use at this time is manufactured at point-of-use. That’s as a result of hydrogen is so costly to distribute. Most hydrogen gasoline cell automobile pumps are dishing out black hydrogen made out of fossil fuels. That’s the most affordable type of hydrogen we’ve needed to date. Within the USA, it’s potential to fabricate hydrogen from grime low-cost pure gasoline for slightly below one US greenback per kilogram. Regardless of that, a truck load of hydrogen delivered is normally US$10 per kilogram. And a kilogram of hydrogen allotted at a gasoline cell pump has different between US$15-25 over the previous few years.

It takes about 14 tube vehicles of hydrogen to ship the identical power content material as a single tanker truck of gasoline. That’s 14 occasions the gap traveled at minimal. 14 occasions the period of paying a driver. 14 occasions the upkeep on vehicles. And people tube vehicles have compressed hydrogen or liquid hydrogen, each of that are power intensive to compress or liquify. On the gasoline cell pumping station, the storage tanks must be compressed rather a lot. And if liquid hydrogen is being delivered, a bunch of tech is required to get it again right into a gasoline rapidly and safely. After which when it’s pumped into vehicles, a pump able to compressing the gasoline to 700 bar (10,000 kilos per sq. inch), or about 700 occasions the strain of the ambiance at sea stage is required. By comparability, scuba tanks prime out at 300 bar.

Distribution of hydrogen is difficult, costly, and threat susceptible. So we solely do it at this time if we’ve got to. Keep in mind, diesel and gasoline are liquids at regular temperatures, and pure gasoline doesn’t must be compressed a lot to carry enough power to be worthwhile. We distribute a lot of these fossil fuels partly as a result of they’re really easy and low-cost to distribute.

The subsequent half is value. Electrolyzing hydrogen is a capex vs opex optimization recreation. Capex, or capital expenditure, is the associated fee to construct the ability, and it must be amortized over the kilograms of hydrogen produced. That implies that a excessive capex drives a requirement for prime utilization. That drives a requirement for electrical energy that’s accessible 60%+ of the yr, or firmed electrical energy. You may’t get that with a single wind farm or a single photo voltaic farm, and in case you construct both to fabricate hydrogen you need to add these capital prices into the capex combine too. You might be unlikely to get that with a wind farm and photo voltaic farm mixed, both, even in case you remarkably have good circumstances for each wind and photo voltaic on the identical website. At minimal you need to add some storage or transmission or each, and that will increase the capex too. Oh, and you need to have much more operational bills bolted on to handle all the above, so your opex goes up, and also you want near grid administration ranges of experience.

Of the elements of an industrial scale electrolysis facility, solely the electrolyzer itself has room for reductions in value as a consequence of manufacturing volumes. The remainder of the elements are comparatively commoditized industrial elements, and there are 27 or so of them. Electrolysis plant prices aren’t going to be reduce by 90%, and doubtless by not more than 20% over time.

On the opposite aspect of the equation, we’ve got a fantastic supply of firmed electrical energy at this time. It’s name the grid. We join multi-MW demand sources to the grid day-after-day. It takes some planning, nevertheless it’s rather a lot cheaper from a capex perspective than constructing a wind and photo voltaic farm in the course of nowhere.

However firmed electrical energy from the grid, which comes with the advantage of present grid-competent operations, comes with utility administration prices and the like. That will increase the opex aspect of the equation.

Construct a facility in the course of nowhere with wind, photo voltaic, storage, transmission, and an industrial electrolysis facility, and you’ve got a really massive capex with a smaller opex burden, however the enormous distribution drawback. Tie an present ammonia facility to the grid, reuse the water provide for steam reformation, substitute the steam reformation facility with electrolysis, and you’ve got a a lot decrease capital value with greater working prices, however with out the distribution drawback.

Constructing an appropriately-scaled hydrogen electrolysis facility at an ammonia plant and operating it on grid electrical energy goes to be cheaper normally than delivering hydrogen manufactured a good distance away to the ammonia plant, or constructing a web new ammonia plant in the course of nowhere with an electrolysis facility. Put an electrolyzer at a nuclear plant to supply its lots of of kilograms per day turbine lubricant behavior is cheaper than delivery in black or grey hydrogen.

So my projection is that the overwhelming majority of hydrogen manufacturing amenities are most fairly positioned at present demand factors, particularly ammonia manufacturing vegetation (the most important persisting demand space for hydrogen), and provided with grid electrical energy. There will probably be instances the place centralizing huge electrolysis amenities at new construct demand facilities is sensible, however nowhere close to the size of present hype-driven proposals primarily based on irrational value prices and irrational demand projections.

Decarbonize the grid, manufacture hydrogen the place it’s wanted from grid electrical energy. As Hydrogen Science Coalition co-founder Paul Martin and I mentioned not too long ago, it’s fully cheap to have robust additionality, locality, and temporality necessities for any federal subsidies, similar to these from the US IRA. That implies that purported inexperienced hydrogen amenities want so as to add renewable electrical energy that’s fairly shut on the grid to the hydrogen facility, and manufacture electrical energy that’s getting into the grid on an identical schedule to electrical energy demand from the hydrogen facility. The place they aren’t getting a subsidy, grid electrical energy will probably be a greater and better option in any occasion.

However in nations that apply an rising carbon value, a few of that begins to develop into a wash so long as we measure the CO2e emissions alongside the best way and apply the carbon value to them. Canada’s carbon value, for instance, consists of methane, a key world warming gasoline. Grid electrical energy will get hit with carbon pricing, which is a part of the explanation why Alberta’s coal vegetation shut down early, decarbonizing their electrical energy fairly quickly. The EU emissions buying and selling scheme (ETS) is inclusive of an increasing number of issues, rising in value per ton and their carbon border adjustment mechanism relies on the ETS, so all the things exported to the EU successfully has the the EU’s carbon value. And whereas the ETS doesn’t embody methane at this time, it is going to embody it in 2026.

Okay, so it’s going to make sense to fabricate hydrogen regionally greater than not, and hydrogen isn’t going to be low-cost.

Enter white hydrogen. What’s that? It’s naturally occurring deposits of gaseous hydrogen underground, therefore someday being referred to as pure hydrogen. Similar precept as pure gasoline (notice the naming similarity) or oil or coal. Some combination of organic and geological processes results in there being hydrogen underground which may be capable of be extracted.

Breathless headlines are throughout it. Claims of limitless hydrogen abound. The hydrogen advocates who’re more and more dismayed by spreadsheet jockeys utilizing life like numbers discovering that hydrogen doesn’t make sense as a retailer of power are leaping onto the white hydrogen bandwagon.

However the enthusiasm is unwarranted.

The most important such announcement not too long ago got here out of France within the Lorraine area, which, whereas higher identified for wine, was additionally a coal mining heart. They’ve provisionally estimated {that a} deposit may have 46 million tons of hydrogen. That feels like rather a lot. However we use about 120 million tons of hydrogen yearly at this time, both in pure kind or as artificial gasoline (syngas), so it’s beneath 40% of a yr’s demand.

So what, if we discover a whole lot of deposits, proper? Effectively, one other website was present in Spain. How a lot hydrogen does it have? Effectively, if it have been all hydrogen, it will be about 1.2 million tons, or about 1% of a yr’s demand. And it isn’t, because it’s blended with different gases. One other website had half a day’s present demand of hydrogen in its estimated reserves.

Effectively, that’s fantastic. We will simply pump it out and use it, proper? Effectively, no. The French website has hydrogen that’s dissolved in an underground aquifer of ‘liquid’. It’s about 16% hydrogen at a kilometer underground, and will increase to approaching 98% hydrogen at 3 kilometers underground per the researchers. (How precisely hydrogen concentrations enhance radically on the backside of an aquifer of liquid is unexplained, and I’m at a little bit of a loss. If anybody is aware of the mechanism by which this might happen, please enlighten me.)

What precisely is the liquid? What else is within the liquid? What’s the course of by which the hydrogen is extracted from the liquid. What’s the price of this extraction? What different gases would possibly escape from the aquifer throughout hydrogen extraction? All unanswered questions. We don’t extract hydrogen from underground at current, and so have at greatest provisional solutions to the questions.

We have already got a giant well-head methane leakage drawback at pure gasoline extraction websites, and methane is a a lot greater and fewer leaky molecule than hydrogen. How a lot hydrogen will probably be misplaced to the ambiance? What are the implications on condition that hydrogen has an oblique world warming potential over ten occasions that of carbon dioxide?

And the French researchers are cautious to level out that their preliminary estimates are simply that, and there’s a whole lot of work to verify their numbers.

So, the most important discover to date is at most 40% of 1 yr’s present hydrogen demand, and it’s unclear what it is going to value to extract it. Oh, and it’s not terribly close to demand facilities. The closest Yara (greatest ammonia producer in Europe) plant in France is on the opposite aspect of the nation, 700 kilometers away. There’s one within the Netherlands that’s beneath 400 km away. There may be an oil refinery simply throughout the border in Germany, the MiRO refinery 40 km away, however are we actually going to waste white hydrogen on hydrodesulfurization of transportation fuels when that market is in steep decline and the world goes to be awash in low sulfur crude oil within the coming a long time? Most likely not.

In different phrases, even when the hydrogen might be extracted fairly cheaply, maybe as cheaply as manufacturing it from pure gasoline, it’s nonetheless not at factors of demand. Hydrogen refueling stations on highways received’t be capable of drill a gap a couple of hundred meters deep and refill their hydrogen storage tanks. It would make sense if it may be extracted at an affordable value to construct a facility on prime of the positioning that may drain it over 30 years, or it may not. I’ll depart that to the spreadsheet jockeys.

There’s a place in Africa, a village within the landlocked Republic of Mali in western Saharan Africa, that truly has 98% pure hydrogen that comes out of the bottom, which they burn to make electrical energy in a bit of turbine. That provides the city of 4,000 folks. Probably not the premise for a worldwide economic system, regardless that there’s extra underground. And Mali is, as soon as once more, a good distance from demand facilities for hydrogen.

So there’s hydrogen underground, greater than we beforehand thought. It’s concentrated in some areas in volumes vastly decrease than present world hydrogen demand. It’s sometimes a good distance from hydrogen demand facilities. We don’t understand how a lot it is going to value to extract and course of, however we do know that it’ll value rather a lot to distribute. It’s not the premise of a radical enlargement of a hydrogen for power economic system, however does maintain out some hope for decarbonization of a few of present hydrogen use.

In any case, hydrogen is presently a worldwide warming emissions drawback on the size of all of aviation.

The Lorraine discover needs to be explored and exploited if potential. Amongst different issues, it’s competing with US$1-3 per kilogram black hydrogen from pure gasoline. Assuming even a buck a kilogram, that’s potential income of US$46 billion — nicely value somebody’s effort to develop and exploit. But it surely’s not a motive to waste hydrogen on transportation or heating.

I do not like paywalls. You do not like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Right here at CleanTechnica, we applied a restricted paywall for some time, nevertheless it at all times felt fallacious — and it was at all times robust to determine what we should always put behind there. In concept, your most unique and greatest content material goes behind a paywall. However then fewer folks learn it! We simply don’t love paywalls, and so we have determined to ditch ours.

Sadly, the media enterprise remains to be a tricky, cut-throat enterprise with tiny margins. It is a endless Olympic problem to remain above water and even maybe — gasp — develop. So …