There was some excellent news out of the UK final week for a change, in that Cadent Fuel deserted its try and power hydrogen down the throats of its prospects within the scenic seaside city of Whitby in Yorkshire. However paired with that may be a remarkably tone-deaf advert by Mobil1, ExxonMobil’s engine oil division. Each are examples of legacy fossil gasoline organizations getting client and public relations fully improper as a result of their bizarre framing.

Earlier than I dig into these examples, nevertheless, it’s price revisiting a few different examples of the problem I’ve revealed about not too long ago.

The primary one is the Methanol Institute. It’s the worldwide lobbying arm for the US$32 billion wooden alcohol business. Methanol is a necessary industrial feedstock, because it and its by-product merchandise, together with ascetic acid and formaldehyde, are utilized in acrylic plastic, artificial materials and fibers used to make clothes, adhesives, paint, and plywood, and as a chemical agent in prescribed drugs and agrichemicals. You’ll observe what’s not included in that listing: utilizing it as a gasoline.

Methanol manufacturing is a giant international warming downside. It’s constructed from pure fuel or coal fuel, and emissions common about 4 tons of CO2e per ton of methanol. The annual market is 120 to 170 million tons, relying on supply. That places its international emissions at between 500 and 700 million tons of CO2e yearly, or maybe 1.5% of world annual CO2e emissions. You’d assume that your complete focus of the world associated to methanol can be abating these emissions first, however I’ve at hand it to the business, they’ve managed to persuade lots of people that this local weather change downside is the clear transport gasoline of the longer term.

You’ll assume that they would depart nicely sufficient alone and deal with your complete factor as the valuable and delicate phantasm of a flower that it’s, however they get up in public and say issues that demand scrutiny, in entrance of people that are inclined to scrutinize issues. Like me, for instance.

A consultant of one of many massive methanol corporations, Proman, which has a three way partnership with Stena Strains round methanol for transport, advised an viewers of Stena maritime technical professionals throughout a debate I used to be a part of in Scotland not too long ago that utilizing unabated methanol was a good suggestion as a result of it was decrease emissions, that they shouldn’t fear concerning the product as a result of the business was going to provide inexperienced methanol sooner or later, and that they need to belief the business.

Proman capturing its personal targets within the age of local weather disaster is seemingly one thing it leans into, as its web site tagline that reveals up in Google searches and on its masthead is “A world chief in pure fuel derived merchandise.” 1995 is looking and would really like its branding again.

I wrote about Proman’s odd assertion some time in the past, together with the typical 5.6x CO2e emissions of unabated methanol in comparison with diesel, and after I revealed, the chief lobbyist for methanol, one Gregory Dolan, who has been CEO of the institute for a exceptional 27 years, tried to right me concerning the actuality that present unabated as low cost because it’s going to get methanol is costlier than diesel and that I ought to repair my errors.

A little bit of an unforced error, as a result of this led me to do a world evaluation of the price of methanol in comparison with diesel per unit of power, one which discovered that on common it’s 1.6 instances as costly as a gasoline and as much as 2.2 instances in a single market, one thing that goes with its virtually six instances as a lot CO2e emissions as simply utilizing fossil fuels straight, like slime mildew with axle grease on toast suggestions.

Now he’s selling this 90-foot luxurious catamaran article written up in rich-people’s toys journal Robb Report as being virtuous as a result of it makes hydrogen from methanol after which powers the yacht with the hydrogen, as if this thermodynamic absurdity and multiplication of the manufacturing emissions of methanol is an effective and virtuous factor. Selling wealthy folks’s toys as a methanol win is a bit tone deaf in a world that’s presently experiencing unprecedented warmth, fires, and flooding. However prosperous previous lobbyists aren’t identified for being related to actuality.

This does, in fact, go hand-in-hand with methanol large Methanex’ claims to have completed a 100% carbon impartial crossing of the Atlantic with a methanol-powered ship earlier this yr. 100%? Extra like 96% unabated fossil methanol with 4% methanol from a landfill. Professional-tip: in case you are making an attempt to make your business appear inexperienced and your product seem to be a good selection for maritime decarbonization, you actually ought to spend the cash to do it proper.

A.P. Møller – Mærsk A/S, the highest income transport firm on the planet by a snug margin, whose homeowners are among the many richest transport agency homeowners on the planet, have purchased in to the methanol business story. They’ve spent extra on methanol transport than some other concern, having 18 dual-fuel ships on order and a number of inexperienced methanol provide contracts inked. They’ll be receiving their first cargo of inexperienced methanol in 2024, a quantity ample to energy the ships for maybe 1-2% of their voyages. If truly inexperienced methanol, it’s a begin, though given how black methanol is I’d desire that inexperienced methanol decarbonize their present industrial demand first.

Maersk is spending some huge cash on this, round US$15 million per ship on prime of the roughly US$100 million price for the essential ship. And inexperienced methanol received’t be low cost. Making 5,000 tons of methanol a day requires about 3,000 tons of moderately pure methane a day. Landfill fuel is about 50% methane, and one of many largest landfills on the planet solely emits about 700 tons of it a day. Methanol manufacturing was scaled up from 2,000 to three,000 ton per day vegetation for economics causes, so scaling it right down to one thing which may make 100-500 tons a day goes backward, no matter how low cost the feedstock is.

After all, intentional creation of high-global warming methane by anaerobic digestion of biomass is a giant factor today, though it’s a head-scratcher to me. Personally, I feel we must be working to radically cut back methane emissions, not rising them. However supposing waste biomass have been used, what’s the amount there? Nicely, what claims to be the world’s largest anaerobic digestion facility is in San Jose, California, apparently meaning to eat about 250,000 tons of natural waste a yr, round 700 tons per day. That’s prone to produce about 10,000 tons of methane a yr, or 30 per day. That’s sufficient for a tiny methanol facility, 1% of the size of what’s thought-about financial today. That’s not going to be low cost both, no matter how low cost the feedstock is.

And, in fact, artificial methanol constructed from inexperienced hydrogen will probably be much more costly. Whereas there are innumerable power-to-x proposals round, all of them boil down to creating inexperienced hydrogen, and that’s not going to be low cost. One in all my purchasers famous {that a} proposal they’d acquired assumed that firmed 1.5 cent US per kWh electrical energy can be accessible 24/7/365. Electrolyzers are getting cheaper, however they received’t be low cost and can should be changed each decade or so. And the steadiness of plant is roughly 27 different industrial parts that are already as low cost as they’ll get. Add on the steadiness of plant for methanol manufacturing, and that’s a bunch of different parts which demand high-utilization.

Maersk is shopping for landfill-derived methanol for the maiden voyage of its first dual-fuel ship, a 2,100 container vessel that will probably be crusing from Ulsan, South Korea, to Denmark, in order that’s good. However is the methanol being made in South Korea? No, it’s being made within the USA and shipped 10,000 km to South Korea. Is that as a result of there are not any landfills in South Korea? No, that’s foolish. Is it as a result of methanol isn’t manufactured in South Korea? Additionally foolish. It’s simply laziness on Maersk’s half to purchase methanol that’s made in the US to ship to South Korea to sail a dual-fuel ship to Denmark. It’s not prefer it doesn’t have the cash to do that proper, or that South Korean corporations wouldn’t have been completely happy to assist.

Personally, I believe that the methanol aspect of these ships will probably be barely be used, and that biodiesel will replenish the opposite aspect of them in vastly larger portions. It’s accessible in ports in thousands and thousands of tons per yr all over the world already, in any case. Nonetheless, Maersk’s methanol head-scratcher isn’t a biggie in comparison with others on this listing, so I’ll give it a cross.

One other instance is the Worldwide Civil Aviation Group (ICAO), the UN group with most nations of the world as members which is meant to ascertain requirements, rules, and in concept at the very least handle local weather motion. Its sibling, the UN Worldwide Maritime Group (IMO), not too long ago set some fairly good, if not good, targets for the business’s decarbonization. Clear, acknowledging the size of the issue and setting interim targets for 2030, 2040, and 2050.

I in contrast the 2 in an article, discovering the ICAO’s revealed plans on its local weather change web page to be ludicrously dangerous by comparability. Mainly, they have been going to develop the business massively with low-carbon options, however keep their present emissions, equal in actuality to about 5% of the worldwide warming emissions downside, untouched.

It seems that they’d up to date that late final yr to targets which nonetheless actively ignored contrail heating forcing to aspirational suggestions to pretty-please clear up. They hadn’t bothered to replace the entrance web page of their web site, their about web page, or their local weather motion web page to say this replace, which might have been fairly good in 1990, however within the 2020s quantities to noxious gaseous effluents.

Just about an personal objective for an entitled group. You’d assume that after this had been identified and so they seen it, they’d have been scrambling to replace their web site. The article went reside virtually per week in the past. As I’m scripting this, has the ICAO web site’s local weather web page been up to date? No, not it hasn’t. Maybe they only haven’t seen the article. Certain, that have to be it.

Nicely, no. One in all their communication officers, in a match of defensiveness, received snippy with me on the time in LinkedIn feedback, together with one wherein I’d acknowledged that I’d missed the 2022 replace and was going to take a look at it. You’d assume that their first motion would have been to repair their fundamental communication car, however no. As a substitute he saved poking at somebody who’d identified a giant communications downside. I identified that his habits broke a number of the fundamental guidelines {of professional} communications, however he was having none of it. This, in fact, led to me assessing the 2022 replace and discovering that it sucked too.

The personal targets carry on mounting from fossil-fuel and fossil-adjacent industries. Am I completed with the present listing? No, no I’m not.

Subsequent up we head to the UK, particularly to the northern finish of it, Yorkshire, the place Monty Python set a sketch concerning the dangerous previous days after they have been fortunate to have a gap in a busy street as a house. The village of Whitby is a fetching little city of 13,000 or so, and well-known for having the looming gothic wreck of an abbey that impressed Bram Stoker’s Dracula. Hmm… that’s a little bit of a tone shift.

Into this idyllic little city with creepy undertones comes Cadent Fuel, the pure fuel utility within the area. They’ve been supplying fuel by way of pipes for 200 hundred years, which seems to have given them the impression that they will do no matter they need to their prospects.

And what they needed to do was stop the scourge of electrification by establishing Whitby as a hydrogen village, the place pipes would convey clear burning hydrogen into folks’s houses for heating and cooking. Nothing improper with that besides 4 instances the dangers of explosions and large price will increase for power. Oh, and the dearth of any licensed hydrogen furnaces and stoves. Oh, and the dearth of any zoning approvals for hydrogen home equipment. Oh, and not one of the residents of the city wanting it. Oh, and the dearth of any sense within the thought in any respect.

Jan Rosenow, Director, European Programmes at Regulatory Help Mission and Honorary Analysis Affiliate at Oxford College, retains observe of the variety of research which have discovered that hydrogen for warmth in houses is a brain-dead concept that shouldn’t be thought-about any extra. His newest rely is 43. As I famous, at the very least seven extra are required to spherical it out to 50. After which one other 50 to make 100, as a result of you possibly can’t be too certain that one thing is a nasty thought simply because it’s bleedingly apparent and 43 strong research agree, with actually none even price lining hen cages with from the pro-hydrogen aspect.

How did Cadent strategy this public relations alternative? Why, they tried to power hydrogen on the homeowners. They refused to ensure that charges wouldn’t go up after the trial. They refused to present folks again their fuel boilers or to put in warmth pumps if the hydrogen trial ended up the best way it could have had it continued. They tried to get Parliament to cross a invoice permitting Cadent and its ilk to enter residents’ houses with out their approval to do it.

Mainly Cadent acted as if the residents of Whitby have been privileged to be serviced by the fuel firm, and as if it was entitled to do something it needed to its prospects.

Understandably, the residents of Whitby, together with some assist from heavyweights like Michael Liebreich and David Cebon, made it clear to Cadent that being unpaid guinea pigs for an ill-fated and harmful experiment was not on. Now Cadent Fuel has deserted the plans for the village it by no means ought to have made within the first place. After all the equivalently silly sibling utility NGN is making an attempt to push their Redcar hydrogen village rope uphill, and up in Scotland SGN remains to be making an attempt to reveal 300 Fife households to the glory that’s hydrogen. Extra personal targets coming.

I’ll give the pure fuel utilities the tiniest little bit of leeway. They’re going through the very, very clear finish of their complete enterprise, and are appearing as determined organizations do. That’s why I make it clear that politicians, governmental companies, and regulators must assist them to close down gracefully. They are going to virtually by no means do it themselves, as an alternative performing more and more unnatural acts of their try to remain in enterprise on the local weather’s, their prospects’, and taxpayers’ expense.

Final in immediately’s roundup of fossil-fuel and fossil-adjacent organizations cocking up their public relations we now have Mobil1. It’s the motor oil model of ExxonMobil. It’s a division of a fossil gasoline main. Anybody paying the slightest consideration is aware of that the fossil gasoline majors have been doing a fantastic job making themselves appear like the company villains in Bond and Mission Not possible films, what with divesting all of their pretense of greening, seeing huge lack of massive title inexperienced executives, and doubling down on their core enterprise of delivering fossil fuels.

What has Mobil1 completed that’s a PR personal objective? Nicely, it determined it needed to do a brand new advert marketing campaign about how a lot freedom driving brings, to extol the virtues of the open street and its capability to attach folks. Sounds heartwarming, doesn’t it?

Nicely, I encourage you to look at the outcomes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3NUs9o6wcM

Ummm… anybody seeing an issue with this? Electrical energy dangerous, inside combustion engine good?

Heaps and much and many persons are seeing this as an intentional anti-electric car advert, as a result of that’s what it appears like. Wires and electrical energy sure up with folks having a horrible time, however within the sunshine an inside combustion automobile. And slicing the wires because the mom and daughter drive fortunately down the street.

Is that the intent? I actually doubt it. After I noticed the primary 30-second model of it, I assumed it was a parody and anticipated to discover a Snopes article indicating that it had been put out by some subversive content material creator with out Mobil1’s approval.

However no. I tracked this again to the press launch from Mobil1. This dystopian electrical nightmare from which solely inside combustion engines powering vehicles driving on roads coated in a fossil gasoline byproducts, asphalt, is meant critically. Permit me to cite liberally from the press launch.

“We dedicate this marketing campaign to our most loyal Mobil 1 customers,” explains Bryce Huschka, Shopper Advertising Supervisor, on behalf of Mobil 1. “For almost 50 years, we’ve been speaking about our unimaginable know-how developments, equivalent to longer drain intervals and gasoline economic system financial savings. However we have been reminded in our analysis that the customers we need to attain are very totally different – they’re not all obsessive about the most recent engine put on safety. What ties them collectively is their inspirational tales of what driving means to them.”

“As we sat down collectively to create the marketing campaign, we every shared our model of the story – explaining how know-how had crept additional into our lives, and the rejuvenation that even a fast drive can convey to the soul,” shares Matt Pruett, Group Artistic Director at promoting company Martin Williams. “In a single instance, a father shared the story of his three-year-old coming house with a crayon household portrait displaying him in entrance of a pc and smartphone. Growing this work induced a number of us to look at our personal relationships with know-how and the impacts of being continuously related.”

Yeah, at no level did the Mobil1 executives or their promoting firm, Minnesota-based Martin Williams, ask “Hey, what is going to this appear like to anybody concerned in and even conscious of, you already know, the largest and most speedy transformation of street transportation ever, electrical vehicles?”

What they have been making an attempt to do is present that we’re to tied to our telephones and gadgets, and that going for a drive in a automobile (which normally today has web radio, connections for sensible telephones) is an effective way to interrupt free from these chains… err… electrical cables.

There’s most likely a good suggestion in there making an attempt to flee from a blinkered perspective. However they began with loyal Mobil1 prospects, which is to say previous individuals who have been shopping for engine oil for 50 years, seemingly don’t care about it, and principally aren’t tied to smartphones 24/7/365. The advert is filled with younger, wholesome, vibrant folks unfairly shackled by all these heavy wires.

Who the heck goes to acknowledge themselves on this nonsense? How did it get previous focus teams? Why didn’t Mobil1 and Martin Williams attempt to escape their blinkered, backward trying body? Who is aware of.

Mobi1’s botched ‘breaking free’ advert is one more personal objective by the fossil-fuel and fossil-adjacent business as they attempt to discover methods to remain related in a world that’s leaving them behind.

I do not like paywalls. You do not like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Right here at CleanTechnica, we applied a restricted paywall for some time, but it surely all the time felt improper — and it was all the time powerful to determine what we must always put behind there. In concept, your most unique and finest content material goes behind a paywall. However then fewer folks learn it! We simply do not like paywalls, and so we have determined to ditch ours.

Sadly, the media enterprise remains to be a tricky, cut-throat enterprise with tiny margins. It is a endless Olympic problem to remain above water and even maybe — gasp — develop. So …